Codewarrior Professional 4.0 | 
 enlarge
| From: Metrowerks
Category: Software
Buy Used: $240.68
Rating:  4 reviews
Sales Rank: 16636
Format: Cd-rom
Platforms: Windows Nt, Macintosh, Linux, Unix, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows Me, Windows 95
Media: CD-ROM
Operating System: Linux
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9.5 x 8.5 x 2
Model: 11041
UPC: 620128110414
EAN: 0620128110414
ASIN: B00003IELF
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: We ship daily! All orders ship out within 2 business days from OR. Your satisfaction is guaranteed!
| |
| Customer Reviews:
 CODE WARRIOR PROFESSIONAL IS WONDERFUL!! March 3, 2003
CodeWarrior for Mac OS, Professional Edition, Release 5 introduces RAD tools for Java including wizards (helpers) for Java applet, application and bean development. The Java RAD is great because it has a graphical layout editor that builds Java program's with a user interface (GUI) using fast, click-and-drop technology.
Release 5 of the Professional editions can be used for Mac OS and CodeWarrior for Windows bundle KL Group's JClass Java Lite components with CodeWarrior. KL Group's JavaBeans added to CodeWarrior gives me versatile tools that enhance the look and functionality of my interfaces, and provides the only truly integrated development tool suite for multiple language and multiple platform development.
WONDERFUL+++++++++++++++
do not pass go, do not collect other tools April 26, 2000
4 out of 7 found this review helpful
If you're developing for Macintosh, don't be distracted by comparisons to other Windows compilers. This is the one to get. Command line? Forget it. Slow? It blazes. Cherished by 90+% of professional shrink-wrap developers. Accept no substitutes.
The only good one January 30, 2000
6 out of 6 found this review helpful
It's solid, fully supported, and updated. At least it's more finder friendly than MPW. Slow but worthwhile. Worth getting.
 Well, at least the name sounds good December 7, 1999
17 out of 30 found this review helpful
My experience with codewarrior hasn't been good at all, to say the least. Their so-called standard C++ Refrence Lib has bugs that cripple any programs I've tried to write using it, and their plentiful on-CD documentation could offer no assistance or guidance. If you're in the market for a compiler, my personal advice is to go with Borland, if you don't want your life and production pipeline needlessly complicated. However, I cannot speak for any other languages it supports.
|
|
|
